
Over 42,000 CRA Accounts Breached: What to Know
More than 42,000 Canadian taxpayer accounts have been breached since 2020. Learn more about the data breach class-action lawsuit involving CRA accounts.
May 20, 2026 - Blog
Authored By Packetlabs

Encryption is one of the most important technologies in modern cybersecurity. Every day, organizations rely on cryptography to protect sensitive information, secure online communications, validate identities, and maintain customer trust. Whether data is being transmitted between cloud applications, stored in a database, or exchanged through encrypted messaging platforms, cryptographic controls play a critical role in safeguarding digital assets.
However, encryption is not invincible.
As organizations strengthen their security posture through encryption, cybercriminals are investing significant resources into discovering ways to bypass, weaken, or exploit cryptographic systems. Attackers continuously develop sophisticated techniques to target encryption algorithms, cryptographic protocols, key management systems, and implementation flaws.
The reality is that even strong encryption can fail if it is poorly implemented, improperly configured, or supported by weak operational security practices.
This article explores what cryptography attacks are, how they work, the most common types of cryptographic attacks organizations face today, and best practices for defending against them.
Cryptography is the practice of securing information through mathematical techniques that transform readable data into an unreadable format.
Its primary objective is to ensure that information remains accessible only to authorized individuals.
At its core, cryptography relies on encryption and decryption processes:
Encryption converts plaintext into ciphertext.
Decryption converts ciphertext back into plaintext.
Cryptographic keys control the transformation process.
Algorithms determine how encryption and decryption occur.
Without the appropriate key, encrypted information should remain unreadable.
Modern cryptography supports several critical security functions:
Ensures unauthorized individuals cannot access sensitive information.
Confirms that data has not been modified or tampered with during storage or transmission.
Verifies the identity of users, devices, systems, or applications.
Prevents parties from denying their actions or communications.
These principles form the foundation of cybersecurity frameworks across industries including healthcare, finance, government, manufacturing, and critical infrastructure.
Virtually every modern security technology relies on cryptography.
Examples include:
SSL/TLS certificates
VPN connections
Secure email systems
Cloud storage encryption
Endpoint protection platforms
Password hashing
Digital signatures
Blockchain technologies
Cryptocurrency platforms
Without cryptography, organizations would struggle to protect confidential information from cybercriminals, nation-state actors, insider threats, and unauthorized access.
As cyber threats continue to evolve, organizations increasingly depend on encryption to secure:
Customer information
Intellectual property
Financial records
Medical data
Trade secrets
Authentication credentials
Internal communications
Unfortunately, attackers understand this dependence and frequently target cryptographic systems directly.
A cryptographic attack (or "cryptography attack") is any attempt to compromise, bypass, manipulate, or break an encryption system.
The objective is typically to:
Recover plaintext from ciphertext
Discover encryption keys
Exploit weaknesses in algorithms
Circumvent authentication mechanisms
Intercept sensitive communications
Modify encrypted information
Rather than attacking the protected data directly, attackers often focus on weaknesses within the encryption ecosystem itself.
These weaknesses may exist in:
Cryptographic algorithms
Encryption implementations
Key management systems
Random number generators
Protocol configurations
Human processes
In many cases, attackers do not need to "break" encryption mathematically. Instead, they exploit implementation flaws that effectively render strong encryption useless.
Cryptographic attacks generally fall into two major categories.
Passive attacks involve observing encrypted communications without altering them.
The attacker attempts to gather intelligence by monitoring data flows and collecting encrypted information for analysis.
Examples include:
Eavesdropping
Traffic analysis
Packet capture
Metadata collection
Passive attacks are often difficult to detect because the attacker leaves little evidence behind.
No modification of data
Difficult to identify
Often used for intelligence gathering
Frequently precede active attacks
Active attacks involve direct interaction with the target system.
Attackers manipulate data, inject malicious content, impersonate users, or alter communications.
Examples include:
Man-in-the-middle attacks
Replay attacks
Chosen ciphertext attacks
Session hijacking
These attacks can result in data theft, unauthorized access, fraud, and operational disruption.
Direct manipulation of systems
More visible than passive attacks
Higher potential impact
Often exploit protocol weaknesses
Brute force attacks are among the oldest cryptographic attack methods.
In this approach, attackers systematically attempt every possible key combination until they find the correct one.
The success of a brute force attack depends on:
Key length
Available computing power
Encryption algorithm complexity
Time available to the attacker
For example:
An 8-bit key has only 256 possibilities.
A 128-bit key has approximately 3.4 × 10³⁸ possibilities.
Modern encryption standards such as AES-256 make brute force attacks computationally impractical.
However, weak passwords, outdated encryption, and poor key generation can significantly reduce security.
Password hashes
Wi-Fi encryption
Legacy encryption systems
Weakly generated keys
Use AES-256 encryption
Enforce strong password policies
Implement account lockouts
Enable multi-factor authentication
Rotate encryption keys regularly
A ciphertext-only attack occurs when attackers possess only encrypted data and attempt to derive meaningful information from it.
No plaintext is available.
The attacker uses:
Frequency analysis
Statistical analysis
Pattern recognition
Machine learning techniques
Historically, ciphertext-only attacks were highly effective against substitution ciphers and early encryption methods.
Modern encryption significantly reduces susceptibility to these attacks.
However, poor implementations may still leak valuable information.
Use modern encryption algorithms
Avoid custom cryptographic implementations
Employ randomized initialization vectors
Use authenticated encryption modes
In a chosen plaintext attack, the attacker can select arbitrary plaintext and observe the resulting ciphertext.
This enables the attacker to study how the encryption system behaves.
By analyzing patterns, attackers may uncover weaknesses in the algorithm or key structure.
One of the most famous examples is differential cryptanalysis.
Attackers may gain access to systems that provide encryption services and submit specially crafted inputs for analysis.
This scenario commonly occurs in:
Web applications
APIs
Encryption services
Authentication systems
Use CPA-resistant algorithms
Implement AES properly
Employ randomized encryption techniques
Avoid deterministic encryption methods
Chosen ciphertext attacks are considered more powerful than chosen plaintext attacks.
The attacker selects ciphertext values and observes how the system decrypts them.
Through repeated testing, attackers may discover:
Secret keys
System weaknesses
Internal cryptographic operations
Historically, older implementations of RSA were vulnerable to chosen ciphertext attacks.
Modern implementations include protections against these risks.
Padding oracle attacks represent a form of chosen ciphertext attack that has affected numerous web applications and SSL/TLS implementations.
Use modern RSA padding schemes
Implement authenticated encryption
Disable vulnerable protocols
Conduct cryptographic code reviews
A known plaintext attack occurs when attackers possess both plaintext and corresponding ciphertext samples.
Using this information, they attempt to identify encryption keys or uncover patterns.
Examples may include:
Standard email templates
File headers
Common system messages
Predictable application outputs
The more plaintext-ciphertext pairs an attacker obtains, the greater the opportunity for analysis.
Known plaintext attacks played a major role in breaking encryption during World War II, including efforts against the German Enigma machine.
Use strong encryption algorithms
Employ randomization techniques
Rotate keys frequently
Implement forward secrecy
Rather than attacking the data directly, these attacks target the cryptographic mechanism itself.
Attackers focus on:
Encryption keys
Key storage systems
Key generation processes
Cryptographic implementations
Common examples include:
Weak random number generation
Key leakage
Side-channel attacks
Timing attacks
Cache attacks
In many modern breaches, attackers steal encryption keys rather than breaking encryption.
Once the key is compromised, encrypted data becomes accessible.
Use hardware security modules (HSMs)
Secure key management systems
Protect cryptographic secrets
Monitor privileged access
Although the six attacks above are foundational, modern cybersecurity professionals must also consider emerging threats.
Attackers intercept communications between two parties and secretly relay or modify information.
MITM attacks frequently target:
Public Wi-Fi
Misconfigured TLS implementations
Certificate validation failures
Attackers capture legitimate encrypted communications and retransmit them later.
These attacks often target authentication systems.
Rather than attacking algorithms directly, attackers analyze physical characteristics such as:
Power consumption
Electromagnetic emissions
CPU timing
Cache behavior
Attackers force systems to use weaker encryption protocols that contain known vulnerabilities.
Examples include attacks against outdated SSL and TLS versions.
Quantum computing represents one of the most significant future threats to cryptography.
Algorithms such as RSA and ECC could eventually become vulnerable to sufficiently powerful quantum computers.
Organizations are increasingly preparing for post-quantum cryptography standards.
Most successful attacks do not occur because encryption is mathematically broken.
Instead, they result from implementation failures.
Common weaknesses include:
Weak passwords undermine encryption strength.
Improper storage or rotation creates opportunities for compromise.
Legacy systems may still use:
DES
RC4
MD5
SHA-1
These technologies are no longer considered secure.
Improper TLS configurations frequently expose organizations to attacks.
Developers who create custom cryptographic solutions often introduce vulnerabilities.
Cloud environments introduce unique cryptographic challenges.
Organizations must protect:
Data at rest
Data in transit
Data in use
Cloud providers typically offer:
Encryption services
Key management platforms
Hardware security modules
However, customers remain responsible for configuring these solutions correctly.
Misconfigured cloud encryption remains a leading cause of data exposure.
Many regulatory frameworks require strong cryptographic controls.
Examples include:
Protects payment card data.
Protects healthcare information.
Protects personal information of EU residents.
Evaluates security controls and operational integrity.
Requires robust information security management.
Organizations that fail to implement proper encryption may face significant penalties and reputational damage.
Strong encryption alone does not guarantee security.
Organizations should regularly evaluate cryptographic controls through:
Penetration testing
Red teaming
Security assessments
Architecture reviews
Code reviews
Cryptographic testing helps identify:
Weak implementations
Vulnerable protocols
Misconfigured certificates
Poor key management practices
A mature security program continuously validates encryption effectiveness rather than assuming it works as intended.
Organizations can significantly reduce cryptographic risk by implementing the following controls:
Adopt AES-256, RSA-3072, ECC, and other modern algorithms.
Protect, rotate, and monitor cryptographic keys.
Reduce credential-related risks.
Validate encryption implementations.
Patch vulnerabilities promptly.
Protect sensitive cryptographic operations.
Identify attacks before significant damage occurs.
Human error remains a major contributor to cryptographic failures.
Develop long-term migration strategies.
The future of cryptography is rapidly evolving.
Key trends include:
Post-quantum cryptography
Zero-trust architectures
Confidential computing
Homomorphic encryption
AI-assisted cryptographic analysis
Decentralized identity systems
As attackers leverage artificial intelligence and automation, defenders must continuously improve cryptographic resilience.
The organizations that succeed will be those that treat encryption as an ongoing process rather than a one-time deployment.
Cryptography serves as the backbone of modern cybersecurity, protecting everything from financial transactions and cloud workloads to healthcare records and critical infrastructure systems.
Yet encryption alone is not enough.
Cybercriminals continuously develop new methods to exploit cryptographic weaknesses through brute force attacks, ciphertext analysis, chosen plaintext attacks, chosen ciphertext attacks, known plaintext attacks, and key compromise techniques. Emerging threats such as side-channel attacks, quantum computing, and AI-assisted cryptanalysis further raise the stakes.
Organizations must recognize that effective cryptographic security extends beyond selecting strong algorithms. Success requires secure implementation, robust key management, continuous monitoring, employee education, and regular security testing.
By integrating cryptographic assessments into a comprehensive cybersecurity strategy, organizations can identify weaknesses before attackers do, strengthen resilience against evolving threats, maintain regulatory compliance, and preserve the trust of customers, partners, and stakeholders.
As the cybersecurity landscape continues to evolve, cryptography will remain both a critical defense mechanism and a primary target for adversaries. The organizations that proactively test, validate, and modernize their cryptographic controls today will be best positioned to defend against tomorrow's attacks.
Speak with an Account Executive